I certainly hope you all enjoyed your Canada Day holiday, which rather rudely fell on a Wednesday, too far away to take an extended long weekend. Canada Day, formerly known as Dominion Day, celebrates the anniversary of the founding of Canada in 1867. Sir John A. Macdonald — statesman, politician, world-class alcoholic — was Canada’s first prime minister.
But surely you know all this. These are elementary Canadian historical facts. But if you are a product of the Canadian education system, there’s a pretty good chance that Macdonald 1867 sounds like the name of an expensive brand of whisky rather than the name of our first PM and our birthdate.
It’s time we faced up to a painful fact of Canadian education: when it comes to teaching Canadian history, we suck. And Alberta sucks worse than any other province.
Last month, The Dominion Institute, those old fuddy-duddies who believe Canadians should have at least a passing knowledge of our history (history is so last year), issued a report card on the teaching of Canadian history in our high schools. Surprisingly, Quebec — the spoiled brat of Confederation, the cradle of separatism, the province that has done its best to alienate all other Canadians — received the highest grade, with a B+.
Yes, Quebec does a better job of teaching Canadian history than any other province. Zut alors!
The worst, with a grade of F? Saskatchewan, Newfoundland, PEI and ... Alberta.
As a father who has watched with dismay and anger as my three sons have complete high school with a barely rudimentary knowledge of Canadian history, this comes as no surprise. Disgraceful and appalling, yes. Surprising, no.
The Dominion Institute found that Alberta does not require students to take even one Canadian history course to graduate. Canadian history, such as it is, is taught under the social studies rubric, a catchall that includes units on Brazil, Russia, Japan, France, China, and the U.S. Shockingly, there is only one Canadian History option available, and only in Grade 11, which the institute describes as lacking in curriculum support and not particularly popular. (It wasn’t even offered as an option in my son’s school.) Twentieth-century Canadian history — which would include such trivial events as the two world wars — is only “minimally covered,” says the report.
In my opinion, high school education in Alberta is overly skewed towards science and math, much of it pointless exercises in mathematical mumbo jumbo. For example, my youngest son, who has been released from the school system after serving his 12-year sentence, learned about “conics” in math class. What, pray tell, are conics? Well, as he describes it, conics is about angles and shapes that occur when you put a plane through a cone. I’m going to assume he’s correct, because I’ve never heard of conics. I suppose conics is necessary to prepare some young Albertans for entry into the emerging putting-a-plane-through-a-cone industry (the Chinese are way ahead of us on this), but I think it’s safe to say that 99 per cent of students will flush their conic knowledge from their brains the minute they’ve taken their last math final. (Note to math and science teachers: save your angry e-mails about the value of mathematics and science. I’ve head it all before. As far as I’m concerned, everything you need to know about math — how to add, subtract, multiply and divide — you learn in elementary. All the rest is filler.)
I’m not sure why Canadian history gets the shaft in Alberta. I suspect there is an institutional bias against it because history is often portrayed as simply teaching dates and events, and because it has no “practical” purpose. Alberta schools, in my view, lean heavily towards training the workforce at the expense of expanding the mind. Also, nobody is interested in what a bunch of dead white males did a long time ago, even if what those dead white males did so long ago made the Canada we live in today.
Alberta is not alone in its disregard of where we came from. In 2007, the Dominion Institute found that 82 per cent of Canadians aged 18 to 24 failed a simple 30-question test about Canadian history. Only 46 per cent knew the name of our first prime minister, and only 26 per cent knew the year of Confederation (see opening paragraph for the answers).
Is history important? Absolutely. Without a knowledge of history, we are mere tenants of our country, not residents. How are you supposed to instill a pride in your country if you leave your young people ignorant of its history, its accomplishments, its failures, its reason for being? Anybody in the world can learn mathematics or science. Only Canadians need to learn Canadian
history.
The teaching of Canadian history in Alberta schools is a disgrace, and Education Minister Dave Hancock and the entire Alberta Learning department should be forced to sit in a corner until they agree to change the whole screwed-up system.
Maurice Tougas is the former Liberal MLA for Edmonton-Meadowlark.
mauricetougas@live.com

Comments: 4
Amedeo wrote:
I’ve worked as doorman at a nightclub and would often solicit bribes by asking to speak to my friends, Sir Wilfred Laurier, John A. MacDonald, Queen Elizabeth II, and/or Mr. Mackenzie King and would inevitably receive more stupefied expressions than bribes. I graduated valedictorian of my high school class in 1996, and when I think about it I really have no clue as to the historical significance of most of those people. Also, I am VERY angry that I wasn’t given the opportunity to learn that our first Prime Minister was a raging alcoholic! However, I did study conics, which was required to complete Mathematics 30 at the time. I realized even then that the complex geometric principles which govern conics would be utterly useless in my future endeavors (which included the study of advanced mathematics, physics, engineering and fashion design) so I used an illegal calculator on my diploma exam and received 100% as my final grade in 12th grade math.
It seems like there was a time when possessing a high school diploma or a post secondary degree meant that a person had attained a level of enlightenment that spanned many fields of study; mathematics, science, history, philosophy, languages, and music come to mind. The stigma still exists, but is largely undeserved. One of the reasons why I eventually dropped out of the prestigious University of Alberta was that I felt like everyone around me was a 1-dimensional zombie who was there as a desperate last grasp at some meaning in their lives i.e. they were so inept at every other facet of living that pursuing a “higher” education was their only option. In our day the idea of a liberal education is a sad joke and being “well educated” is now a process which may be the opposite of the old ideal of enlightenment through learning: the creation of a shallow automaton with a pronounced lack of knowledge, wisdom, competence or even the ability to perceive the world around them in a critical way.
Amedeo Pagliuso, Edmonton
on Jul 4th, 2009 at 7:25pm Report Abuse
adamwb wrote:
And honestly, you guys must have either not paid attention or just had really shitty social studies teachers because (at least in my experience a few years ago) the Edmonton high-school social-studies curriculum is basically built around a Canadian history focus.
on Jul 7th, 2009 at 1:54pm Report Abuse
Ann wrote:
Not that I don't agree with Maurice on this one because I definitely believe he is right about the importance of history. People tend to take things for granted but there's a story behind everything. Knowing history gives people a sense of belonging and respect for the past. Plus, a good historical account of an event is a far more awe-inspiring read than a made-up fictional account of similar circumstance.
The last math class I took was Calculus something-or-other, which was forced upon me by university requirements. And I can honestly say that I possess no recollection of anything I learnt in that class.
“One of the reasons why I eventually dropped out of the prestigious University of Alberta was that I felt like everyone around me was a 1-dimensional zombie who was there as a desperate last grasp at some meaning in their lives i.e. they were so inept at every other facet of living that pursuing a “higher” education was their only option. In our day the idea of a liberal education is a sad joke and being “well educated” is now a process which may be the opposite of the old ideal of enlightenment through learning: the creation of a shallow automaton with a pronounced lack of knowledge, wisdom, competence or even the ability to perceive the world around them in a critical way.” - Amedeo
Really? You really feel that way, Amedeo? That’s sad, dude. And bitter, too. I, personally, have sacrificed many things to stay at the University of Alberta for as long as possible because I love learning. And, I love the people I meet there. I have a great deal of respect for my professors, and for the critical, and often opposing, opinions voiced by my fellow students when engaged in discussion about a variety of issues. I have owned a successful small business in the past, so you can hardly claim I stay there only because I am so inept at everything else in my life. It’s rather small-minded of you to stereotype all students into one category. Mayhap, post-secondary education isn’t your cup of tea, which is perfectly fine. You definitely don’t need it to be financially successful while still doing something you love. But please don’t assume such things because of your shitty experience.
on Jul 7th, 2009 at 8:22pm Report Abuse
blind51de wrote:
I'll post my letter sent to Maurice RE his column, from before I knew there were comments on here:
<i>(To Whom It May Concern, hopefully Mr. Tougas)
While I respect your opinion, I don't think Canadian history is as bad off in Alberta under the Social Studies class as you make it out to be. No doubt you've had reservations about how your kids were being taught for a long time, but I think the way you vented in your column waxed too personal. And I as well as plenty of peers who survived the HORRIFYING Alberta Ed experience probably feel the same.
In Social', pretty much every year we'd spend about half of it doing a unit on a foreign country and the other half doing Canadian history with some geography shoehorned in for kicks. Multiculturalism was always a big deal, as far back as I recall. To be honest, a class containing nothing but Canadian history (the way were taught it, anyway) would be nothing short of a nightmare. I don't hate our history, it's just that Social Studies... even as watered down as you make it out to be, was just a really heavy class.
Kids in school, at least when I attended (I'm 23), don't really have any spare periods either. Should we split Social Studies in two and make a new class, extending the overall school day? The classes were tightly knit enough as they were. I mean, hell, in third grade. A partner and I were assigned a 10-15 minute presentation on Radisson and Groseilliers, of all people. A bunch of other groups had to do similarly-lengthed labors on all kinds of similarly explorers and traders, from Cabot to Champlain to the guys I just mentioned. I took pretty much nothing from that, except a bit of a head start on how to do presentations at a middle-school level. It involved a lot of painstaking research for an eight year old kid and I remember about two bullet points from the whole thing.
My point is that Canadian history isn't being underrepresented, it's that it's not planned well enough for age groups. It doesn't needs its own special class for students to languish in as they learn the same things over and over, it needs better planning so that situation won't emerge as often. Should we start teaching World Wars in junior high instead of senior high? Sure, I'll go with you on that one. But a seven year old isn't going to understand the importance of the Cordillera or the significance of Martin Frobisher, kids that age need to be eased into the seeming monotony of history or they'll make a habit of purging everything they learn about it year after year. Trust me. These are the real problems, and hopefully your kids can attest to that.
Not to mention good teachers. In my thirteen years of Edmonton Public schooling, I had only two that made anything interesting out of Social Studies. Two.</i>
on Jul 10th, 2009 at 11:29am Report Abuse
Post comment: (Login or Register)